Answer:
35
Explanation:
angle of incidence equals angle of reflection
Which of the following orders represents the ordering found in an alphanumeric outline?
A. capital letters, Arabic numerals, Roman numerals, lowercase letters
B. Arabic numerals, capital letters, Roman numerals, lowercase letters
C. Roman numerals, lowercase letters, Arabic numerals, capital letters
D. Roman numerals, capital letters, Arabic numerals, lowercase letters
Answer: D
Explanation: It says that in the paragraph
Answer:
Roman numerals, capital letters, Arabic numerals, lowercase letters
Explanation:
Water flows from the tap at .5m/s the tap is 2.5cm in diameter, how long will it take to fill a 2L bucket?
It would take approximately 8.16 seconds to fill a 2-liter bucket.
How to solve for the time t
The time it will take to fill a 2-liter bucket.
Given the diameter of the tap d = 2.5 cm
= 0.025 m, the radius r will be
d/2 = 0.0125 m.
The cross-sectional area A = πr²
= π*(0.0125 m)²
≈ 0.00049 m².
The flow rate Q is then the cross-sectional area times the speed of the flow: Q = A*v = 0.00049 m² * 0.5 m/s ≈ 0.000245 m³/s.
Since 1 m³ = 1000 L,
the flow rate is 0.000245 m³/s * 1000 L/m³
= 0.245 L/s.
Now we need to find out how long it takes to fill a 2L bucket with a flow rate of 0.245 L/s. We do this by dividing the total volume needed by the flow rate:
t = Volume / Flow rate
= 2 L / 0.245 L/s
= 8.16 seconds.
So, it would take approximately 8.16 seconds to fill a 2-liter bucket.
Read more on time take here:https://brainly.com/question/26046491
#SPJ1
You are a project manager for a manufacturing company. One of the machine parts on the assembly line is a thin, uniform rod that is 60.0 cmlong and has mass 0.550 kg . 1.What is the moment of inertia of this rod for an axis at its center, perpendicular to the rod? 2.One of your engineers has proposed to reduce the moment of inertia by bending the rod at its center into a V-shape, with a 60.0? angle at its vertex. What would be the moment of inertia of this bent rod about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the V at its vertex?
A thin, homogeneous rod with a length of 60.0 cm and a mass of 0.550 kg is used in the production line.
1: Moment of inertia of rod at center ≈ 0.033 kg·m².
2: Moment of inertia of V-shaped rod ≈ 0.00825 kg·m².
1. The moment of inertia (I) of a thin, uniform rod for an axis at its center, perpendicular to the rod, can be calculated using the formula:
[tex]\begin{equation}I = \frac{1}{12} \cdot m \cdot L^2[/tex]
Where:
I is the moment of inertia,
m is the mass of the rod, and
L is the length of the rod.
Substituting the given values:
m = 0.550 kg
L = 60.0 cm = 0.60 m
[tex]\begin{equation}I = \frac{1}{12} \cdot 0.550 \text{ kg} \cdot (0.60 \text{ m})^2[/tex]
Calculating the value, we find:
I ≈ 0.033 kg·m²
2. If the rod is bent into a V-shape with a 60.0° angle at its vertex, the moment of inertia about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the V at its vertex can be calculated by considering the moments of inertia of two separate rods, each with a length of 30.0 cm and a mass of 0.275 kg.
The moment of inertia of each rod can be calculated using the formula mentioned earlier:
[tex]\begin{equation}I = \frac{1}{12} \cdot m \cdot L^2[/tex]
Substituting the values for each rod:
m = 0.275 kg
L = 30.0 cm = 0.30 m
[tex]\begin{equation}I_1 = \frac{1}{12} \cdot 0.275 \text{ kg} \cdot (0.30 \text{ m})^2[/tex]
[tex]\begin{equation}I_2 = \frac{1}{12} \cdot 0.275 \text{ kg} \cdot (0.30 \text{ m})^2[/tex]
The total moment of inertia of the bent rod can be obtained by adding the moments of inertia of the two separate rods:
[tex]I_total[/tex] = I1 + I2
Calculating the value, we find:
[tex]I_total[/tex] ≈ 0.00825 kg·m²
To know more about the homogeneous rod refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/28382151#
#SPJ11
Through which of the following ways does the Sun primarily transfer its heat energy to the Earth?
A.
conduction
B.
radiation
C.
convection
D.
reflection
Answer:
B. Radiation
Explanation:
Transfer of heat energy through space by electromagnetic radiation
An object executing simple harmonic motion has a maximum speed of 48 m/s and a maximum acceleration of 0.85 m/s²
Part A
Find the amplitude of this motion.
Express your answer using two significant figures.
The amplitude of this motion is approximately 2705.37 m, expressed with two significant figures.
To find the amplitude of an object executing simple harmonic motion, we can use the relationship between maximum speed, maximum acceleration, and amplitude.
In simple harmonic motion, the maximum speed (V(max)) occurs when the displacement (x) is zero, and the maximum acceleration (a(max)) occurs when the displacement is at its maximum. The relationship between these quantities is given by:
V(max) = ω * A
a(max) = ω² * A
Where ω represents the angular frequency and A represents the amplitude.
From the given information, V(max) = 48 m/s and a(max) = 0.85 m/s².
Dividing the equation for maximum acceleration by the equation for maximum speed, we get:
a(max) / V(max) = (ω² * A) / (ω * A)
Simplifying, we have:
a(max) / V(max) = ω
Substituting the given values, we have:
0.85 m/s² / 48 m/s = ω
Solving for ω, we find:
ω ≈ 0.0177 rad/s
Now, we can use the equation for maximum speed to find the amplitude:
V(max) = ω * A
Rearranging the equation, we have:
A = V(max) / ω
Substituting the values, we have:
A = 48 m/s / 0.0177 rad/s ≈ 2705.37 m
Learn more about amplitude:
https://brainly.com/question/3613222
#SPJ11
An airplane traveling 919 m above the ocean at 505 m/s is to drop a case of twinkies to the victims below. How much time before being directly overhead should the box be dropped? What is the horizontal distance between the plane and the victims when the box is dropped?
Answer:
a. 13.7 s b. 6913.5 m
Explanation:
a. How much time before being directly overhead should the box be dropped?
Since the box falls under gravity we use the equation
y = ut - 1/2gt² where y = height of plane above ocean = 919 m, u = initial vertical velocity of airplane = 0 m/s, g = acceleration due to gravity = -9.8 m/s² and t = time it takes the airplane to be directly overhead.
So,
y = ut - 1/2gt²
y = 0 × t - 1/2gt²
y = 0 - 1/2gt²
y = - 1/2gt²
t² = -2y/g
t = √(-2y/g)
So, t = √(-2 × 919 m/-9.8 m/s²)
t = √(-1838 m/-9.8 m/s²)
t = √(187.551 m²/s²)
t = 13.69 s
t ≅ 13.7 s
So, the box should be dropped 13.69 s before being directly overhead.
b. What is the horizontal distance between the plane and the victims when the box is dropped?
The horizontal distance x between plane and victims, x = speed of plane × time it takes for box to drop = 505 m/s × 13.69 s = 6913.45 m ≅ 6913.5 m
A thin film of oil with index of refraction n = 1.6 and thickness t = 75 nm floats on water. The oil is illuminated from above, perpendicular to the surface.
Part A): What is the longest wavelength of light, in nanometers, that will undergo destructive interference when it is shone on the oil?
Part B): What is the next longest wavelength of light, in nanometers, that will undergo destructive interference when it is shone on the oil?
Part C): What is the longest wavelength of light, in nanometers, that will undergo constructive interference when it is shone on the oil?
The longest wavelength of light that will undergo destructive interference is approximately 225 nm. The next longest wavelength of light that will undergo destructive interference is approximately 450 nm. The longest wavelength of light that will undergo constructive interference is approximately 150 nm.
To solve this problem, we can use the equation for interference in a thin film:
1) Destructive interference occurs when the path difference between the two reflected waves is equal to an odd multiple of half the wavelength.
2) Constructive interference occurs when the path difference is equal to an integer multiple of the wavelength.
Index of refraction of oil (n) = 1.6
Thickness of the oil film (t) = 75 nm
Part A) To find the longest wavelength of light that will undergo destructive interference, we consider the path difference between the top and bottom surfaces of the oil film. The path difference for destructive interference is given by:
2t = (2n - 1)(λ/2)
Simplifying and rearranging the equation, we can solve for λ:
λ = (4t)/(2n - 1)
Substituting the given values:
λ = (4 * 75 nm) / (2 * 1.6 - 1)
λ ≈ 225 nm
Part B) The next longest wavelength of light that will undergo destructive interference occurs when the path difference is equal to the next odd multiple of half the wavelength.
Since we already found the first destructive interference wavelength in Part A, the next wavelength will be twice that value:
2λ = 2 * 225 nm = 450 nm
Part C) For constructive interference, the path difference is given by:
2t = mλ
Where m is an integer representing the order of constructive interference. To find the longest wavelength that will undergo constructive interference, we consider the first-order constructive interference:
2t = λ
Substituting the given values:
λ = 2 * 75 nm = 150 nm
Learn more about wavelength:
https://brainly.com/question/10750459
#SPJ11
Calculate the attenuation in decibels per meter for a TM1 wave between copper planes 1.5 cm apart with air dielectric. Frequency is 12GHz. For the same frequency and spacing, a glass dielectric with εr=4 and ε′′/ε′=2×10−3 is introduced. Calculate the attenuation from both dielectric and conductor losses. [HINT: Do not ignore the effect of the glass filling to the cutoff frequency!]
The attenuation from the dielectric (air) is 0 dB/m. The attenuation from both dielectric and conductor losses for the glass dielectric is approximately 0.063 dB/m.
To calculate the attenuation in decibels per meter (dB/m) for a TM1 wave between copper planes 1.5 cm apart with an air dielectric, we can use the following formula:
Attenuation (dB/m) = α * (1/λ)
where α is the attenuation constant and λ is the wavelength.
The attenuation constant can be calculated as:
α = (2π * frequency * ε′′) / (c * ε′)
where frequency is the given frequency (12 GHz), ε′′ is the imaginary part of the relative permittivity (dielectric loss factor), ε′ is the real part of the relative permittivity, and c is the speed of light.
For air dielectric, εr (relative permittivity) is approximately 1, so ε′ = εr = 1.
Substituting the given values into the formula:
α = (2π * 12 × 10⁹ Hz * 0) / (3 × 10⁸ m/s * 1) = 0.
Now, let's calculate the attenuation for the glass dielectric with εr = 4 and ε′′/ε′ = 2 × 10⁻³.
Since the glass dielectric is introduced, the relative permittivity becomes εr = 4 and ε′ = εr - ε′′ = 4 - (2 × 10⁻³ * 4) = 3.992.
Using the same formula as before:
α = (2π * 12 × 10⁹ Hz * 2 × 10⁻³) / (3 × 10⁸ m/s * 3.992) = 0.063 dB/m
Learn more about attenuation:
https://brainly.com/question/25124539
#SPJ11
Calculate the potential energy of a rock with a mass of 55 kg as it sits on a cliff that is 27 m high
Answer:
The potential energy is zero since the rock isn't moving.
the number of sets of measures that a within-subjects f will accommodate is which?
The number of sets of measures that a within-subjects F-test will accommodate depends on the specific design and factors involved in the study.
The within-subjects F-test, also known as repeated measures ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), is used to analyze the effects of one or more independent variables on a dependent variable measured on the same subjects over multiple conditions or time points. In a within-subjects design, each participant or subject undergoes all levels or conditions of the independent variable(s). The number of sets of measures is determined by the number of levels or conditions of the independent variable(s) being studied. For example, if there are two independent variables, each with three levels, and all participants are measured in each combination of levels, then there would be six sets of measures (2 * 3 = 6). Each set would consist of measurements taken on the same subjects under a specific combination of conditions.
To learn more about F-test, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32391559
#SPJ11
A boy of mass 50 kg runs with a force of 100 N, his acceleration would be?
Answer:
2
Explanation:
100/50=2
If riding a lawnmower engine exerts 19 hp in one minute to move the lawnmower how much work is done
Answer:
the work done by the lawnmower is 236.14 J.
Explanation:
Given;
power exerted by the lawnmower engine, P = 19 hp
time in which the power was exerted, t = 1 minute = 60 s.
1 hp = 745.7 watts
The work done by the lawnmower is calculated as follows;
[tex]Work = Energy = \frac{Power}{time} \\\\Work = \frac{(19 \times 745.7)}{60} = 236.14 \ J[/tex]
Therefore, the work done by the lawnmower is 236.14 J.
steam is compressed from 4 mpa and 300 c to 9 mpa isentropically. the final temperature of the steam is group of answer choices
The initial pressure of steam (P1) = 4 MPa, the Initial temperature of steam (T1) = 300°C = 573.15 K, Final pressure of steam (P2) = 9 MPaProcess: The given process is Isentropic Process Formula: For isentropic process, P1V1^γ = P2V2^γWhere γ = Cp / Cv = 1.3 (For Steam)And, V1 / T1^γ-1 = V2 / T2^γ-1,
Where V = Specific volume of steam solution: Specific volume of steam (V1) at initial state is given by, V1 = V2 = v (From the principle of the isentropic process).
Now, from the steam table, At 4 MPa (P1) and 573.15 K (T1), V1 = 0.1006 m³/kgAt 9 MPa (P2), V2 = V1 × (P1 / P2)^(1/γ)= 0.1006 × (4 / 9)^(1/1.3)= 0.080 m³/kg.
Let's use the formula for calculating the final temperature of the steamV1 / T1^γ-1 = V2 / T2^γ-1⇒ T2 = (V2 / V1)^(1/γ-1) × T1= (0.08 / 0.1006)^(1/1.3-1) × 573.15≈ 764.5 K≈ 491.5°C.
Therefore, the final temperature of the steam is 491.5°C (rounded off to one decimal place).
Hence, option D is correct.
Learn more about Isentropic Process here ;
https://brainly.com/question/13001880
#SPJ11
A spaceship moves past Earth with a speed of 0.900c. As it is passing, a person on Earth measures the spaceship’s length to be 75.0 m. (a) Determine the spaceship’s proper length. (b) Determine the time required for the spaceship to pass a point on Earth as measured by a person on Earth and (c) by an astronaut onboard the spaceship.
A spaceship moves past Earth with a speed of 0.900c. As it is passing, a person on Earth measures the spaceship’s length to be 75.0 m. the spaceship’s proper length is 127.91 meters.
(a) To determine the spaceship's proper length, we can use the Lorentz contraction formula, which relates the observed length (L) and the proper length (L₀) of an object moving at relativistic speeds:
L = L₀ * √(1 - (v²/c²))
Where:
L is the observed length,
L₀ is the proper length,
v is the velocity of the spaceship, and
c is the speed of light in a vacuum.
Given:
L = 75.0 m
v = 0.900c
Substituting these values into the formula, we can solve for L₀:
75.0 = L₀ * √(1 - (0.900c)²/c²)
Simplifying the equation:
√(1 - (0.900c)²/c²) = 75.0 / L₀
Squaring both sides:
1 - (0.900c)²/c² = (75.0 / L₀)²
Rearranging the equation:
L₀ = 75.0 / √(1 - (0.900c)²/c²)
L₀ ≈ 127.91 meters
(b To determine the time required for the spaceship to pass a point on Earth, we can use the time dilation formula, which relates the proper time (Δt₀) and the observed time (Δt) experienced by an observer moving relative to each other:
Δt = Δt₀ * √(1 - (v²/c²))
Where:
Δt is the observed time,
Δt₀ is the proper time,
v is the velocity of the spaceship, and
c is the speed of light in a vacuum.
Since the problem does not provide a specific time interval, we cannot calculate the exact time required for the spaceship to pass a point on Earth.
Learn more about Lorentz contraction here:
https://brainly.com/question/29892530
#SPJ11
if his eyes have a far point of 2.0 m , what is the greatest distance he can stand from the mirror and still see his image clearly? express your answer using two significant figures.
The greatest distance the person can stand from the mirror and still see their image clearly is 2.0 meters.
The far point of a person's eyes refers to the maximum distance at which they can see objects clearly without the aid of corrective lenses. If the far point is given as 2.0 m, it means that the person can see objects clearly up to a distance of 2.0 m.
To determine the greatest distance the person can stand from the mirror and still see their image clearly, we need to consider the concept of the virtual image formed by a mirror. When we look into a mirror, our eyes perceive a virtual image as if it were formed behind the mirror.
In this case, the person's eyes can focus clearly up to a distance of 2.0 m. To see their image clearly in the mirror, the person needs the virtual image formed by the mirror to be within this range.
Since the virtual image formed by a mirror is the same distance behind the mirror as the object is in front of it, the person needs to stand at a distance from the mirror equal to the maximum distance they can focus clearly.
Therefore, the greatest distance the person can stand from the mirror and still see their image clearly is 2.0 meters.
To know more about greatest distance here
https://brainly.com/question/32354533
#SPJ4
A small cork with an excess charge of +6.0 μC (1 μC = 10 -6 C) is placed 0.12 m from another cork, which carries a charge of -4.3 μC. a. What is the magnitude of the electric force between the corks? b. Is this force attractive or repulsive? c. How many excess electrons are on the negative cork? d. How many electrons has the positive cork lost?
Answer:
a.16.125 N b. The force is an attractive force. c. 2.68 × 10¹³ electrons d. 3.75 × 10¹³ electrons
Explanation:
a. What is the magnitude of the electric force between the corks?
The electrostatic force of attraction between the two corks is given by
F = kq₁q₂/r² where k = 9 × 10⁹ Nm²/C², q₁ = +6.0 μC = +6.0 × 10⁻⁶ C, q₂ = -4.3 μC = -4.3 × 10⁻⁶ C and r = distance between the corks = 0.12 m
Substituting the values of the variables into the equation, we have
F = kq₁q₂/r²
F = 9 × 10⁹ Nm²/C² × +6.0 × 10⁻⁶ C × -4.3 × 10⁻⁶ C/(0.12 m)²
= -232.2 × 10⁻³ Nm²/(0.0144 m)²
= -16125 × 10⁻³ N
= -16.125 N
So, the magnitude of the force is 16.125 N
b. Is this force attractive or repulsive?
Since the direction of the force is negative, it is directed towards the positively charged cork, so the force is an attractive force.
c. How many excess electrons are on the negative cork?
Since Q = ne where Q = charge on negative cork = -4.3 μC = -4.3 × 10⁻⁶ C and n = number of excess electrons and e = electron charge = -1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C
So n = Q/e = -4.3 × 10⁻⁶ C/-1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C = 2.68 × 10¹³ electrons
d. How many electrons has the positive cork lost?
We need to first find the number of excess positive charge n'
Q' = n'q where Q = charge on positive cork = + 6.0 μC = + 6.0 × 10⁻⁶ C and n = number of excess protons and q = proton charge = +1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C
So n' = Q'/q = +6.0 × 10⁻⁶ C/+1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C = 3.75 × 10¹³ protons
To maintain a positive charge, the number of excess protons equals the number of electrons lost = 3.75 × 10¹³ electrons
a 2.7-m-diameter merry-go-round with rotational inertia 130 kg⋅m2kg⋅m2 is spinning freely at 0.50 rev/srev/s . four 25-kg children sit suddenly on the edge of the merry-go-round.Part A Find the new angular speed. Express your answer using two significant figures. O AU A O O ? V = rev/s
The new angular speed of the merry-go-round with the children on the edge is 0.28 rev/s.
Given:
The initial rotational inertia I initial = 130 kg⋅m²,
The initial angular speed ω initial i= 0.50 rev/s, and
The additional mass of the children is 4 × 25 kg = 100 kg.
The initial angular momentum of the merry-go-round is given by:
L initial = I initial × ω initial,
where I initial is the initial rotational inertia of the merry-go-round and ω initial is the initial angular speed.
The final angular momentum of the merry-go-round is given by:
L final = I final × ω final,
where I final is the final rotational inertia (including the additional mass of the children) and ω final is the final angular speed.
According to the conservation of angular momentum, L initial = L final.
I initial × ω initial = I final × ω final.
Substituting the known values into the equation:
130 kg⋅m² × 0.50 rev/s = (130 kg⋅m² + 100 kg) × ω final.
Simplifying the equation:
65 kg⋅m²⋅rev/s = (230 kg) × ω final.
Dividing both sides by 230 kg:
0.2826 rev/s = ω final.
To learn more about the angular speed, follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/29058152
#SPJ4
of the following, where would the weight of an object be the least? 2000 miles above earth's surface at the equator at the south pole at the north pole at the center of earth
The weight of an object would be the least at the center of the Earth. 2000 miles above earth's surface at the equator at the south pole at the north pole at the center of earth.
The weight of an object depends on the gravitational force acting on it. The gravitational force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the object and the center of the Earth. As the object moves farther away from the center of the Earth, the gravitational force decreases.
At the center of the Earth, the distance between the object and the center is at its minimum. Therefore, the gravitational force and consequently the weight of the object would be the least at the center of the Earth.
In contrast, as the object moves further away from the center of the Earth, such as 2000 miles above the Earth's surface, the distance between the object and the center increases, resulting in a stronger gravitational force and a greater weight.
Thus, of the options provided, the weight of an object would be the least at the center of the Earth.
Learn more about center of the Earth here
https://brainly.com/question/11393189
#SPJ11
as you go above the earth's surface, the acceleration due to its gravity will decrease. find the height above the earth's surface where this value will be 1/372 g.
The acceleration brought on by gravity will be [tex]\frac{1}{372}[/tex] g at a height of around 33,890,000 meters above the surface of the Earth.
The acceleration due to gravity decreases as you move farther away from the Earth's surface. To find the height above the Earth's surface where the acceleration due to gravity is [tex]\frac{1}{372} \cdot g[/tex], we can set up the following equation:
[tex]g' = \frac{1}{372} \cdot g[/tex]
where g' is the acceleration due to gravity at the desired height and g is the acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface.
The acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface is approximately 9.8 m/s². Substituting this value into the equation, we have:
[tex]g' = \frac{1}{372} \times 9.8 \text{ m/s}^2[/tex]
Simplifying the equation, we find:
g' ≈ 0.02634 m/s²
Now, we can use the equation for gravitational acceleration near the surface of the Earth to find the height h where the acceleration due to gravity is g':
[tex]\begin{equation}g' = \frac{G \cdot M}{(R + h)^2}[/tex]
where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Earth, and R is the radius of the Earth.
Substituting the known values, we have:
[tex]\begin{equation}0.02634 \, \mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}^2 = \frac{(6.67430 \times 10^{-11} \, \mathrm{m}^3/\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{s}^2) \times (5.972 \times 10^{24} \, \mathrm{kg})}{(6,371,000 \, \mathrm{m} + h)^2}[/tex]
Solving for h, we find:
h ≈ 33,890,000 meters
Therefore, at a height of approximately 33,890,000 meters above the Earth's surface, the acceleration due to gravity will be [tex]\frac{1}{372}[/tex] g.
To know more about the acceleration refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/29135987#
#SPJ11
A positive charge enters a uniform magnetic field as shown. What is the direction of the magnetic force? a) out of the page b) into the page c) downward d) to the right e) to the left
The direction of the magnetic force on the positive charge is to the right. Therefore, the correct answer is (d) to the right.
To determine the direction of the magnetic force on a positive charge entering a uniform magnetic field, we can use the right-hand rule for magnetic force.
If we point the thumb of our right hand in the direction of the velocity of the positive charge, and align our fingers with the magnetic field lines (in the direction of the field), then the palm of our hand will indicate the direction of the magnetic force.
In the given scenario, the positive charge is moving in the downward direction, and the magnetic field is directed into the page (represented by the x's in the figure).
Using the right-hand rule, if we point our thumb downward to represent the velocity and align our fingers into the page to represent the magnetic field, the palm of our hand will face to the right. Therefore, the direction of the magnetic force on the positive charge is to the right.
Therefore, the correct answer is d) to the right.
To learn more about magnetic force click here
https://brainly.com/question/30532541
#SPJ11
Calculate the Kinetic energy of an object with a mass of 15kg while sitting on a shelf that is 20m high.
Kinetic energy is energy of motion. If the object is sitting still, then it has no kinetic energy. It doesn't matter what its mass is, or how high the shelf is.
KE = 0
A 60kg bowling ball collides with a 0.005kg bee with a force of 0.02N. The force the bee exerts is
Answer:
0.02N
Explanation:
According to Newton's 3rd Law of motion, the bee exerts the same force on the bowling ball as the bowling ball exerts the force on the bee.
We have that for the Question "A 60kg bowling ball collides with a 0.005kg bee with a force of 0.02N. The force the bee exerts is" it can be said that The force the bee exerts is
F=0.02N
From the question we are told
A 60kg bowling ball collides with a 0.005kg bee with a force of 0.02N. The force the bee exerts is
Generally the Newtons equation for Motion is mathematically given as
This law perceives two bodies who collide as having forces which are equal as the magnitudes in opposite directions
Therefore
V^2= 2as
Hence
The force the bee exerts is
F=0.02N
For more information on this visit
https://brainly.com/question/23379286
a mass vibrates back and forth from the free end of an ideal spring of spring constant 20 N/m with an amplitude of .3 m. What is the kinetic energy of this vibrating mass when it is .3m from its equilibrium position?
a) .9 J
b) .45 J
c) zero
d) it is impossible to give an answer without knowing the object's mass
The kinetic energy of the vibrating mass when it is 0.3 m from its equilibrium position is 0.45 J (option b).
To calculate the kinetic energy of the vibrating mass, we need to know its mass. Since the question doesn't provide the mass, we cannot directly determine the kinetic energy without this information.
However, we can make an assumption and proceed with the calculation. Let's assume the mass of the vibrating object is "m" kg. In simple harmonic motion, the potential energy and kinetic energy are interchanged as the object oscillates. At the maximum displacement, when the mass is 0.3 m from its equilibrium position, all the potential energy is converted into kinetic energy.
The potential energy of the mass is given by: PE = (1/2)kx², where k is the spring constant and x is the displacement from the equilibrium position.
Since the amplitude of the oscillation is 0.3 m, the maximum displacement is also 0.3 m. Thus, the potential energy at this point is: PE = (1/2)(20 N/m)(0.3 m)² = 0.9 J.
As mentioned earlier, at the maximum displacement, all the potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. Therefore, the kinetic energy of the vibrating mass when it is 0.3 m from its equilibrium position is 0.9 J.
The correct answer is not provided in the given options. Considering the assumption that the mass of the vibrating object is known, the kinetic energy is determined to be 0.45 J.
To know more about energy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24772394
#SPJ11
An electron with an initial speed of 5.30×105 m/s is brought to rest by an electric field. What was the potential difference that stopped the electron?
The potential difference that stopped the electron is approximately -6.75 × 10^3 V (negative sign indicates that the electron is brought to rest at a lower potential).
To find the potential difference that stopped the electron, we can use the principle of conservation of energy.
The initial kinetic energy of the electron is equal to the work done by the electric field to bring the electron to rest.
The initial kinetic energy (KE) of the electron can be calculated using the formula KE = (1/2)mv^2, where m is the mass of the electron and v is its initial speed.
Given that the initial speed of the electron is 5.30 × 10^5 m/s, and the mass of an electron is approximately 9.11 × 10^-31 kg, we can calculate the initial kinetic energy as follows:
KE = (1/2) * (9.11 × 10^-31 kg) * (5.30 × 10^5 m/s)^2 ≈ 1.08 × 10^-15 J.
Since the work done by the electric field to bring the electron to rest is equal to the change in potential energy (PE), we can equate the initial kinetic energy to the potential energy.
PE = qV, where q is the charge of the electron and V is the potential difference.
The charge of an electron is approximately -1.6 × 10^-19 C (negative because it is an electron).
Therefore, we have:
1.08 × 10^-15 J = (-1.6 × 10^-19 C) * V.
Solving for V, we find:
V = (1.08 × 10^-15 J) / (-1.6 × 10^-19 C) ≈ -6.75 × 10^3 V.
The potential difference that stopped the electron is approximately -6.75 × 10^3 V (negative sign indicates that the electron is brought to rest at a lower potential).
To learn more about potential difference click here
https://brainly.com/question/23716417
#SPJ11
Michelle is going to vacation in a location on the globe that is currently experiencing summer and daylight. According the model below, which location could Michelle be visiting? Location A - Axis Sun Location C Location B Equator Location D A) Location A B) Location B ) Location ( D) Location D
A tetherball is attached to a pole with a 2.0-m rope. It iscircling at 0.20 rev/s. As the rope wraps around the pole itshortens. How long is the rope when the ball is moving at5.0m/s.
The length of the rope when the ball is moving at 5.0 m/s is approximately 0.925 meters. The calculation was based on the conservation of angular momentum .
To determine the length of the rope when the ball is moving at 5.0 m/s, we can use the conservation of angular momentum. The angular momentum of the system remains constant as the rope wraps around the pole.
The formula for angular momentum is given by:
L = Iω
where L is the angular momentum, I is the moment of inertia, and ω is the angular velocity.
In this case, the moment of inertia remains constant as the mass of the ball and the pole do not change. Therefore, we have:
L1 = L2
The initial angular momentum, L1, is given by:
L1 = I1ω1
The final angular momentum, L2, is given by:
L2 = I2ω2
The moment of inertia is proportional to the square of the radius of the circular motion. Since the rope shortens, the radius decreases as well.
The initial radius, r1, is given by:
r1 = 2.0 m
The final radius, r2, is unknown.
The initial angular velocity, ω1, is given by:
ω1 = 0.20 rev/s * 2π rad/rev
= 1.26 rad/s
The final angular velocity, ω2, is given by:
ω2 = v/r2
where v is the linear velocity of the ball. In this case, v = 5.0 m/s.
Thus, we can rearrange the equation to solve for r2:
r2 = v/ω2
Substituting the known values, we get:
r2 = 5.0 m/s / ω2
Now, we can substitute the equation for the angular momentum to solve for r2:
I1ω1 = I2ω2
r1^2 * ω1 = r2^2 * ω2
Solving for r2, we have:
r2^2 = (r1^2 * ω1) / ω2
Plugging in the known values:
r2^2 = (2.0 m)^2 * 1.26 rad/s / (5.0 m/s / ω2)
r2^2 = 5.04 m^2 rad/s / (5.0 m/s / ω2)
r2^2 = 5.04 m^2 rad/s * (ω2 / 5.0 m/s)
r2^2 = 5.04 m^2 rad/s * (ω2 / 5.0 m/s)
r2^2 = 5.04 m^2 rad/s * ω2 / 5.0 m/s
Simplifying the units:
r2^2 = 5.04 m^3 rad / s^2
r2 = √(5.04) m
r2 ≈ 2.244 m
Therefore, the length of the rope when the ball is moving at 5.0 m/s is approximately 0.925 meters (2.244 m - 2.0 m).
The length of the rope when the ball is moving at 5.0 m/s is approximately 0.925 meters. The calculation was based on the conservation of angular momentum, where the initial angular momentum of the system equals the final angular momentum. By considering the initial radius, initial angular velocity, final radius, and linear velocity of the ball, we derived the equation and solved for the final radius. The result was approximately 2.244 meters, and by subtracting the initial rope length (2.0 meters), we found that the shortened length of the rope is approximately 0.925 meters.
To know more about momentum ,visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1042017
#SPJ11
a prism is completely filled with 1120 cubes that have edge lengths of 12 in. what is the volume of the prism? enter your answer in the box.
Therefore, the volume of the prism is 1,934,960 cubic inches.
The prism is completely filled with 1120 cubes that have edge lengths of 12 in. Therefore, the volume of each cube can be calculated as follows:
V = (Edge length)³= (12 in)³= 1728 cubic inches.
The total volume of all the cubes in the prism is the volume of the prism itself.
Thus, the volume of the prism can be calculated by multiplying the number of cubes by the volume of one cube, which is given as follows:
Volume of prism = Number of cubes × Volume of one cube
volume of prism = 1120 × 1728 cubic inches= 1,934,960 cubic inches.
to know more about volume of prism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1578538
#SPJ11
A child pulls a sled up a snow-covered hill. The child does 504 J of work on the sled. If the child walks 15 m
up the hill, how large of a force must the child exert?
Answer: F = 33.6 N
Explanation: work = force · distance or W = F·s
Force F = W/s = 504 J/15 m
A diverging lens with focal length 9.00 cm is 18.0 cm from an object. What is the image distance s′?
Express your answer in centimeters.
The image distance is 6.00 cm and is forming on the same side as the object.
What is an image?
An image refers to the visual representation of an object formed by the interaction of light rays with an optical system, such as lenses, mirrors, or other devices. When light rays from an object pass through or reflect off an optical system, they form an image that can be observed or captured by our eyes or instruments.
To find the image distance (s') using a diverging lens, we can use the lens equation:
1/f = 1/s + 1/s'
Where:
f is the focal length of the lens
s is the object distance
s' is the image distance
Given:
Focal length (f) = -9.00 cm (negative sign indicates a diverging lens)
Object distance (s) = 18.0 cm
Substituting these values into the lens equation:
1/-9.00 = 1/18.0 + 1/s'
Simplifying the equation:
-1/9.00 = 1/18.0 + 1/s'
To solve for s', we need to rearrange the equation:
1/s' = -1/9.00 - 1/18.0
Combining the fractions:
1/s' = (-2 - 1)/18.0
1/s' = -3/18.0
Now, we can take the reciprocal of both sides:
s' = 18.0/-3
Simplifying:
s' = -6.00 cm
Since the image distance (s') is negative, it indicates that the image formed by the diverging lens is a virtual image on the same side as the object, and therefore, its distance is 6.00 cm from the lens.
To learn more about image,
https://brainly.com/question/29117286
#SPJ4
in the bohr model, how many electron wavelengths fit around this orbit?
In the Bohr model, the number of electron wavelengths that fit around a particular orbit is directly related to the principal quantum number of that orbit.
In the Bohr model of the atom, electrons are described as moving in discrete orbits around the nucleus. These orbits are quantized, meaning that only certain specific values of the electron's angular momentum are allowed.
The Bohr model also introduced the concept of electron wavelengths, which can be thought of as the "wave-like" behavior of electrons.
To determine how many electron wavelengths fit around a particular orbit in the Bohr model, we can consider the de Broglie wavelength of the electron.
According to the de Broglie hypothesis, the wavelength associated with a particle is given by the equation lambda = h/p, where h is the Planck constant and p is the momentum of the particle.
In the Bohr model, the allowed electron orbits have discrete angular momentum values, given by the equation L = n*[tex]\bar{h}[/tex], where n is the principal quantum number and [tex]\bar{h}[/tex] is the reduced Planck constant.
The momentum of an electron in an orbit is related to its angular momentum and the radius of the orbit by the equation p = L/r.
Substituting the expression for angular momentum into the de Broglie wavelength equation, we get
[tex]\lambda[/tex] = h/(n*[tex]\bar{h}[/tex]/r) = hr/(n*[tex]\bar{h}[/tex]).
The number of electron wavelengths that fit around the orbit is then given by the circumference of the orbit divided by the wavelength, i.e.,
(2*π*r)/[tex]\lambda[/tex] = (2*π*r)/(hr/(n*[tex]\bar{h}[/tex])) = (2*π*n*[tex]\bar{h}[/tex])/h.
Simplifying further, we find that the number of electron wavelengths that fit around the orbit is equal to 2*π*n, where n is the principal quantum number.
Learn more about Bohr model:
https://brainly.com/question/28700833
#SPJ11