The relation on the set of all people described as (a, b) E Rif if and only if a and b have a common grandparent is reflexive and transitive, but not symmetric or antisymmetric.
Reflexive: A relation is reflexive if every element in the set is related to itself. In this case, every person would have a common grandparent with themselves, so the relation is reflexive.
Symmetric: A relation is symmetric if whenever (a, b) is in the relation, then (b, a) is also in the relation. However, having a common grandparent is not necessarily symmetric. For example, if person A has a common grandparent with person B, it does not imply that person B has a common grandparent with person A. Therefore, the relation is not symmetric.
Transitive: A relation is transitive if whenever (a, b) and (b, c) are in the relation, then (a, c) is also in the relation. In this case, if person A has a common grandparent with person B, and person B has a common grandparent with person C, then it follows that person A has a common grandparent with person C. Therefore, the relation is transitive.
Antisymmetric: A relation is antisymmetric if whenever (a, b) and (b, a) are in the relation, then a = b. In this case, if two people have a common grandparent, it does not imply that they are the same person. Therefore, the relation is not antisymmetric.
To summarize, the relation is reflexive and transitive, but not symmetric or antisymmetric.
To know more about reflexive, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30105705#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
This is a multi-part question. Once an answer is submitted, you will be unable to return to this part Determine whether the relation on the set of all people is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and/or transitive, where (a. b) E Rif and only if ind b have a common grandparent. (Check all that apply)
reflexive
symmetric
transitive
antisymmetric
Hello um I need help if anyone could help me with this that would be perfect:))!!
Answer:
1. If D= whole numbers then the answer is B.0 if it is integers the answer is A.-10
2. The answer is D. That number is an irrational number.
Step-by-step explanation:
Im pretty sure that #1 is B.0, but since there are no labels and i haven't done this in a while, I wasn't quite sure. Sorry.
what is the midline equation of y= 7sin (3pi/4 x - pi/4) +6
Answer: 6
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: y=6
Step-by-step explanation:
rebecca’s electric bill is a variable expense. what is the average amount she pays for electricity if she paid $135 in december, $129 in january, $99 in february, $120 in march and $140 in april?
The average amount Rebecca pays for electricity based on the given data is $124.60.
To calculate the average, we add up the amounts she paid in each month and then divide by the total number of months. In this case, the sum of her payments is $135 + $129 + $99 + $120 + $140 = $623. Dividing this sum by the total number of months (5), we get an average of $623 / 5 = $124.60. Calculating the average helps us determine the typical amount Rebecca pays for electricity based on the given data. It provides an overall picture of her average expenses in the specified period.
To know more about averages here: brainly.com/question/24057012
#SPJ11
Find the perimeter of the window to the nearest hundredth.
perimeter: about
ft
All real solutions of the equation.
Find the x-intercept(s) Round to nearest hundredth if needed y=-2x^2-8x-4
y=-2x^2-8x-4
-2x^2-8x=4
divide by negative 2
x^2+4x=-2
complete the square
(x+2)^2=-2+4
(x+2)^2=2
x+2=±[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]
x=-2±[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]
nearest hundreths,
x=-0.59
x=-3.41
Suppose that the number of defects on a roll of magnetic recording tape has a Poisson distribution for which the mean A is either 1.0 or 1.5, and the prior probability mass function of A is as follows: (1.0) = 0.4 and (1.5) = 0.6. If a roll of tape selected at random is found to have four defects, what is the posterior probability mass function of X? The posterior p.m.f is____.
The posterior probability mass function of X is given below:0.4 * 0.0183 = 0.00732.0.6 * 0.0513 = 0.03078. Posterior Probability Mass Function of X: ____0.00732 if A = 1.0.____0.03078 if A = 1.5.
Explanation: The probability mass function for Poisson distribution is given by: P(X = x) = (e^-λ * λ^x) / x!Where,λ is the mean. The given prior probability mass function of A is P (A = 1.0) = 0.4P(A = 1.5) = 0.6.
Thus, the mean is either A = 1.0 or A = 1.5.
Now, let X be the number of defects on a roll of tape. Using the law of total probability, the probability mass function of X is P (X = x) = P (X = x, A = 1.0) + P (X = x, A = 1.5)
Using Bayes' theorem, the posterior probability mass function is given by: P (A = 1.0 | X = 4) = P (X = 4 | A = 1.0) * P (A = 1.0) / P (X = 4) P (A = 1.5 | X = 4) = P (X = 4 | A = 1.5) * P (A = 1.5) / P (X = 4)
Now, we need to calculate P (X = 4 | A = 1.0) and P (X = 4 | A = 1.5) using the Poisson distribution.
P (X = 4 | A = 1.0) = (e^-1 * 1^4) / 4! = 0.0183.P(X = 4 | A = 1.5) = (e^-1.5 * 1.5^4) / 4! = 0.0513.
Now, we need to calculate the value of the denominator,
P (X = 4). P (X = 4) = P (X = 4, A = 1.0) + P (X = 4, A = 1.5) = P (X = 4 | A = 1.0) * P (A = 1.0) + P (X = 4 | A = 1.5) * P (A = 1.5)
Put the values: P (X = 4) = (0.0183 * 0.4) + (0.0513 * 0.6) = 0.0342.
Put the values in the above posterior probability mass function equations,
we get: P (A = 1.0 | X = 4) = 0.00732 and P (A = 1.5 | X = 4) = 0.03078.
Therefore, the posterior probability mass function of X is:0.00732 if A = 1.0.0.03078 if A = 1.5.
To know more about probability refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27342429
#SPJ11
Calculate each value for ⊙P. Use 3.14 for π and round to the nearest tenth.
please help!! will mark brainliest!!
Answer:
226.19 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Find measure of angle A
Answer:
angel a is 65 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
40+2x+10=180
40-40+2x+10-10=180-40-10
2x=130
x=65
checking:
65 + 10 + 40 = 75 + 40 = 115
115+65=180
180=180
Combine the like terms to create an equivalent expression for 4z−(−3z)
Answer:
7z
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 7z
Step-by-step explanation:
two negatives cancel into a positive, so -(-3z) is +3z. 4z + 3z = 7z
Plz help me
The points (6, 10) and (5, 7) fall on a particular line. What is its equation in slope-intercept form?
Write your answer using integers, proper fractions, and improper fractions in simplest form.
NO LINKS
Answer:
Finding the equation using the two points is: y=3x-8
The slope is: m=3
The slope and y-intercept is: 3, (0,-8)
Step-by-step explanation:
I put all of these answers because i was basically fully confused by the wording of this question.. Sorry.
what are three ways you can solve a proportion?
Answer:
horizontal
vertical
diagonal
Step-by-step explanation:
I guess I only know those.hope it helps you
In the diagram linem is parallel to linen
with a transversal linet.
Which of the below terms best describe
the relationship between <3 and <4?
Answer:
Alternate exterior angles
Step-by-step explanation:
If they shared a vertex, they would be vertical angles, but since they are on different lines, and alternate sides, the dark blue (alternate exterior angles) answer is correct.
Find the distance between the two points.
(-4, 7), (4,0)
units.
The distance between the two points is
Answer: √113 or 10.63
Step-by-step explanation: the exact answer is √113, or 10.63 if you're looking for the decimal form
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the distance between two points A = (-4,7) and B = (4,0).
Here, x1 = -4 , y1 = 7
x2 = 4 , y2 = 0
Use the distance formula to find out the distance between two points are:
AB = √[(x2-x1)²+(y2-y1)²]
= √[{4-(-4)}²+(0-7)²]
= √[(4+4)²+(-7)²]
= √[(8)² + (-7)²]
= √[(8*8)+(-7*-7)]
= √[64+49]
= √[113] ⇛10.630 units approximately.
Based on the data shown below X 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 19 10 data 45.22 44.74 40.96 37.68 33.7 30.62 30.94 24.26 21.88 21.4 11 Find the correlation coefficient. What proportion of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in the values of x? Report answer as a percentage accurate to one decimal place.
There is a strong negative linear relationship between x and y, and almost all of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in x.
The correlation coefficient is -0.961 and the proportion of the variation in y that can be explained by the variation in the values of x is 92.3%.
The correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. In this case, the correlation coefficient between x and y is -0.961, which indicates a strong negative linear relationship between the two variables.
The coefficient of determination (r²) measures the proportion of the variation in y that can be explained by the variation in the values of x. In this case, the value of r² is 0.923, or 92.3%. This means that 92.3% of the variability in y can be explained by the variability in x. Therefore, there is a strong negative linear relationship between x and y, and almost all of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in x.
Know more about correlation coefficient here:
https://brainly.com/question/29704223
#SPJ11
MARK BRAINLIESTTTTTT
Answer:
i think its c hope it helps
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the distance between the two points rounding to the nearest tenth (if necessary). (-1,8) and (8,5)
Write the equation of the line graphed at the right(please help I really need this)
the correct answer is X= -3
What is the Median for the Box & Whisker Plot below?
HELP PLEASEE
Answer:
20
Step-by-step explanation:
The following data gives an approximation to the integral M = S'f(x) dx = 2.0282. Assume M = N,(h) + kyha + k_h* + ..., N,(h) = 2.2341, N, then N2(h) = 2.01333 1.95956 0.95957 2.23405
The value of N₂(h), for the following data gives an approximation to the integral M = [tex]\int\limits^1_0 {f(x)} \, dx[/tex] N₁(h)= 2.2341 N₁(h/2) = 2.0282 is 0.8754. So, none of the options are correct.
Given that N₁(h)= 2.2341 and N₁(h/2) = 2.0282.
Applying Richardson's extrapolation method, we can find the value of the definite integral M using the formula,
M = N₁(h) + k₂h² + k₄h⁴ + ...
Therefore, we have to find the value of N₂(h).
Here, h = 1 - 0 = 1.
N₂(h) can be obtained by the formula,
[tex]N_2(h) = \frac{(2^2 * N_1(h/2)) - N_1(h)}{2^2 - 1}[/tex] , Substituting the data values we get,
[tex]N_2(h) =\frac{(2^2 * 2.0282) - 2.2341}{2^2 - 1}[/tex]
[tex]N_2(h)= \frac{8.1128 - 2.2341}{3}[/tex]
[tex]N_2(h)=\frac{2.6263 }{3}[/tex]
[tex]N_2(h)=0.8754333 = 0.8754[/tex]
Therefore, none of the option is correct.
The question should be:
The following data gives an approximation to the integral M = [tex]\int\limits^1_0 {f(x)} \, dx[/tex] N₁(h)= 2.2341 N₁(h/2) = 2.0282. Assume M = N₁(h) + k₂h² + k₄h⁴ + ... then, N₂(h) =
a. 2.01333
b. 1.95956
c. 0.95957
d. 2.23405
To learn more about the integral: https://brainly.com/question/30094386
#SPJ11
Pls help and thank youuuuu:)
Answer:
22
Step-by-step explanation:
according to your question
In this problem, y=c₁ece is a two-parameter family of solutions of the second-order DE y-y-0. Find a solution of the second-order TVP consisting of this differential equation and the given initial conditions. y(-1)=2 y(-1) = -2;
The solution of the second-order differential equation y'' - y' = 0 with the given initial conditions y(-1) = 2 and y'(-1) = -2 is y(x) = 2e^x - 4e^-x.
To find a solution to the second-order differential equation y'' - y' = 0, we first solve the characteristic equation by assuming a solution of the form y(x) = e^(rx). Plugging this into the differential equation, we get r^2e^(rx) - re^(rx) = 0. Factoring out e^(rx), we have e^(rx)(r^2 - r) = 0. This gives us two possible values for r: r = 0 and r = 1.
For r = 0, the corresponding solution is y₁(x) = c₁, where c₁ is a constant.
For r = 1, the corresponding solution is y₂(x) = c₂e^x, where c₂ is a constant.
To find the particular solution that satisfies the given initial conditions, we substitute the values of x = -1, y(-1) = 2, and y'(-1) = -2 into the general solution. This gives us the equations 2 = c₁ and -2 = c₂e^-1. Solving for c₁ and c₂, we find c₁ = 2 and c₂ = -2e.
Therefore, the solution to the second-order differential equation with the given initial conditions is y(x) = 2e^x - 4e^-x.
Learn more about differential equation here:
https://brainly.com/question/32538700
#SPJ11
An interval estimate for the average amount of money spent by Australian students on subscription based entertainment platforms in a week was reported to be $32468 to $37224. This interval estimate was based on a sample of 48 students. The variance of the population was determined from previous studies to be $44582179 squared. What level of confidence can be attributed to this interval estimate? State your answer as a percentage, correct to the nearest whole number.
The level of confidence that can be attributed to the interval estimate is approximately 97%. This means that we can be 97% confident that the true average amount of money spent by Australian students on subscription-based entertainment platforms falls within the range of $32,468 to $37,224.
To determine the level of confidence for the interval estimate, we need to consider the t-distribution and the degrees of freedom associated with the sample size.
Since the sample size is 48, the degrees of freedom would be 48 - 1 = 47. Using a t-distribution table or calculator, we can find that with 47 degrees of freedom, a confidence level of approximately 97% corresponds to a t-value of 2.682.
Since the interval estimate is not explicitly provided, we can assume it to be the range between $32,468 and $37,224.
We have that the t-value is associated with a two-tailed test, the level of confidence for this interval estimate is approximately 97%.
Therefore, we can attribute a confidence level of 97% to this interval estimate, indicating that we can be 97% confident that the true average amount of money spent by Australian students on subscription-based entertainment platforms falls within the given range.
To know more about confidence level refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31508283#
#SPJ11
Please answer <33 I would lava it :)
Answer:
5 gallons
Step-by-step explanation:
3/4 + 6/8 + 20/8 + 1
6/8 + 6/8 + 20/8 + 8/8
40/8 = 5 gallons
PLEASE HELP HURRY WILL GIVE BRAINLIST IF CORRECT
Answer:
26 per week
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the volume of an oblique circular cylinder that has a radius of five feet and a height
of three feet
Answer:
235.5 cubic feet
Step-by-step explanation:
The volume v of a circular cylinder whose base radius is r and height h is given as
v = πr^2h
where π is 22/7 or 3.14
Given that the radius is five feet and the height is three feet
the volume v = 3.14 *5^2 * 3
= 235.5 cubic feet
The volume of the oblique circular cylinder is 235.5 cubic feet
please help------------,
Answer:
600 cm²
Step-by-step explanation:
The shaded area (A) is calculated as
A = area of square - ( area of 3 unshaded triangles )
area of square = 40 × 40 = 1600 cm²
area of lower right triangle = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] × 20 × 40 = 10 × 40 = 400 cm²
area of upper left triangle = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] × 40 × 20 = 20 × 20 = 400 cm²
area of lower left triangle = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] × 20 × 20 = 10 × 20 = 200 cm²
Then
A = 1600 - (400 + 400 + 200 ) = 1600 - 1000 = 600 cm²
The measures of the angles of a triangle are shown in the figure below. Solve for x.
Answer: x = 10
Step-by-step explanation:
The sum of interior angles in a triangle is equal to 180°.
(2x + 3) + (5x + 17) + 90 = 180
2x + 3 + 5x + 17 + 90 = 180
7x + 110 = 180
7x = 70
x = 10
A custom fish tank shaped like a rectangular prism needs to have a length of 21 inches, a width of 16 inches and hold a volume of 6758 cubic inches. What height must the tank be made to meet these specifications?
Answer:
i dont know im not that smart ask someone else dude
Step-by-step explanation:
For the following argument, construct a proof of the conclusion from the given premises, -(3x) (PX Mx), (3x) (Mx Sx) 1:. -(x) (SxPx)
To construct a proof of the conclusion "-(∀x) (S(x) ∧ P(x))" from the given premises "-(3x) (P(x) ∧ M(x))" and "(3x) (M(x) ∧ S(x))," we can use a proof by contradiction.
We will assume the negation of the conclusion and derive a contradiction. Here's the proof:
-(∀x) (S(x) ∧ P(x)) (Assumption)Therefore, we have derived a contradiction, which allows us to conclude that the negation of the assumption is false. Thus, we can conclude:
-(∀x) (S(x) ∧ P(x))
To learn more about premises visit:
brainly.com/question/29699382
#SPJ11